Alcohol was responsible 85,000 deaths in the United States in 2006. In 2000 alone, tobacco was to blame for an overwhelming 435,000 deaths. In the whole past of humanity, marijuana has never been documented as a reason of death. Not one person in noted history has died due to the consumption of cannabis. (Annual Cause of Death in the United States.). However, marijuana has been connected to short term memory loss and to a faintly condensed lung volume when habitually inhaled. Marijuana also impairs judgment and motor skills, but its effects are nowhere near as severe as those of alcohol. As is the same with other habits, those who frequently consume cannabis typically a tolerance against these side effects which makes them even less deterring.
Most media outlets draw you to believe that marijuana is more addicting than it truly is. “Nicotine is the most addictive drug there is, even above heroin. After nicotine and heroine comes cocaine, and then alcohol. Below that is caffeine, and at the very bottom of the chart is marijuana; less addictive than your can of Dr. Pepper. “(Which Drugs are the Most Addictive).
Nowadays, marijuana laws cost tax payers billions of dollars every year. Taxpayers are forced to pay for nothing more than every person that is incarcerated for possession of marijuana. In a lot of these cases, people are sent to prison for possession because they are probationers or parolees and it is unlawful to have drugs in your possession or in your system. Three joints can cause someone to spend life in prison because of the three strikes rule, which is a huge financial burden for taxpayers; all due to the fact that marijuana is an illegal drug. Taxpayers are also obligated to remunerate all legal action that leads up to the “offender’s” incarceration. It is estimated by a Harvard study that over $7 billion is spent annually on marijuana prohibition (Miron).
If the government would legalize cannabis, and regulate and tax it like other commercial goods, it would bring in a large amount of revenue for the government. If it were taxed like ordinary goods, the estimated revenue generated from taxes on marijuana would be around $2.4 billion annually, and as high as $6.2 billion annually if it were taxed like alcohol and tobacco (Miron).
There are many opinions counter to the legalization of marijuana; several of which I have tackled by now. Some of the counterarguments relate more to social issues than to personal beliefs or health concerns. One strong dispute against the legalization of marijuana is the idea that cannabis will get into the hands of our children if made legal. This has been proven to be untrue because marijuana is already easily attainable to kids. There is an additional counter-argument that states that is it is actually less difficulty for kids to obtain cannabis than it is for them to obtain alcohol. 35% of students said marijuana was easily obtainable while only 5% said alcohol was easy to obtain (CASA Study Finds Marijuana Easier for Teens to Get than Beer). It is easy for many people, including politicians, to agree with this statistic dealing with the fact that drug dealers don’t ask for I.D.
Undoubtedly, the greatest counterargument towards marijuana is that it’s a “gateway drug.” Many people believe that consuming marijuana significantly increases your possibilities of resorting to tougher drugs like cocaine and heroin. This is a textbook example of a “post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy.” This informal logical fallacy occurs when one assumes Since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X. Just because some people who use tough drugs began with marijuana does not mean that marijuana causes people to do tougher drugs. Someone who wants to try a hard drug such as cocaine will try it regardless of if they have consumed marijuana before or not. People should stop blaming this harmless plant for the se of hard drugs. Instead of people accepting responsibility for their actions, everybody seeks the scape goat.
It’s difficult to understand why cannabis is still illegal in the US. There has not been an intellectual argument against the regulation and legalization of cannabis that cannot be swiftly discharged or refuted. Many politicians will not support this position because they are afraid of receiving negative feedback from their supporters. The public has become brainwashed that legalizing marijuana is identical to tolerating it, which it is not. A vote for the legalization of cannabis does not require that the voter condone its use. The truth is, many people would proscribe bronzing beds, fatty foods, cigs, and alcohol, because of the damage they cause. But this is America, and America is with regards to freedom and choice. People should be given the choice to enjoy marijuana without the fear of criticism or prosecution. During this time of economic stress, the government should be seeking means of creating jobs, producing continuous revenue, and increasing the principles of its citizens. Why won’t they rid of this unjust law Can’t they just magnify their minds.